The three comparative lenses of the original Atlas: the progress track, the two-country radar and the good practice podium. The visualisations organise documented evidence — they are not a ranking of national merit.
Each lane represents the extent of the public evidence mapped across the eight dimensions.
Two assessments side by side, dimension by dimension. ∅ = dimension not assessed (off the radar, never zero).
Mechanisms that merit study — each entry identifies a concrete mechanism, the country of origin and the official source. Input for analysis, not automatic replication.
Author and maintainer: Joelcio Carvalho · Data and method: repository compendio-alimentacao-escolar-brasil · The visualisations organise the available evidence and make comparisons explicit; they do not constitute a merit ranking or a legal opinion. Score, evidence and confidence are always presented separately.