A universal, decentralised programme with a minimum family farming procurement requirement and social oversight by the CAE. This profile shows only evidence published in the Compendium — it assigns no scores: the dimension-based assessment model lives in the Atlas, with rubrics and human review.
Maturity band of the documented evidence
consolidated system
Documented evidence
45 / 50
rubric 2026.1, assessed dimensions only — extent of evidence, not merit
Cobertura publicada
100%
public layers of the profile in the Atlas
Dimensions assessed
5 / 8
dimension without evidence = not assessed, never zero
Programa
PNAE
universal and decentralised · School Meals Coalition
Minimum procurement from family farming45% of the FNDE transferLei nº 15.226/2025, vigente desde 1º/01/2026 (antes: 30%, Lei nº 11.947/2009)
Controle socialCAE mandatoryschool feeding councils in each federative entityin-depth compendium →
Progress track — federal legal frameworks
2009
Lei nº 11.947/2009
Universal coverage and a minimum of 30% of the FNDE transfer for family farming. Automatic transfer into a dedicated account, with no formal agreement required.
2025
Lei nº 15.226/2025
Amends Lei nº 11.947/2009: raises the family farming minimum to 45% (in force on 1º/01/2026) and regulates the shelf life of the foodstuffs procured.
2026
FNDE resolutions
Updated per capita values and operating rules (Resoluções CD/FNDE de 2026). Under quarterly revalidation with human review.
Federal execution 2025 — budget action 00PI (PNAE)
Valores pagos per month, compiled from the official Portal da Transparência export. Total paid in the financial year: R$ 5.538.221.693. Financial stages remain separate in the table.
How to read this: commitment, verification, payment and carried-over payables are distinct stages — none of them, on its own, is equivalent to "total spending on school meals". The federal transfer does not measure the total municipal school feeding budget.
Author and maintainer: Joelcio Carvalho · Data and method: repository compendio-alimentacao-escolar-brasil · The visualisations organise the available evidence and make comparisons explicit; they do not constitute a merit ranking or a legal opinion. Score, evidence and confidence are always presented separately.